Home Videos The Project Relevant Research Paper(s) The Community Church Project

Work In Progress: paper coming soon…

The Determinants of Choice for Improved Water Supply Among Rural Households in Kenya: Who Participates in Community Decision-making? 

David W. Nerubucha

 This paper discusses access and use of improved water supply among rural households in Kenya. Given the basic tenets of the economic perspective,  (scarcity & choice, rational behaviour and utility) it is argued that quality perceptions and opportunity costs play an important role in households’ choice of water source. It is asserted that the various water sub-sectors have not paid sufficient attention to paradigms, norms and models that do not cater to the needs of a large number of people particularly in developing nations and have failed to achieve the impact on poverty.[1] Thus, the factors that determine households’ decisions in using a specific water source are examined with the following questions in mind.

 

The Bar-Sauri Water and Sanitaion MDG Experience: Lessons for Bungoma-Sikulu Water Project.

Written by: The MDG Team – Sauri, Kenya
Prepared for adaptation to Sikulu and Sinyerere Villages by: David W.Nerubucha

Background

The majority of household water is collected from springs and rainwater harvesting systems (when rain is available). Rainwater is considered an improved source. Springs, however, are considered either improved or unimproved depending on whether or not they have been protected. The water quality tests of various water sources in Sauri showed that even protected springs contained unsafe levels of feacal coli form bacteria.

Types of Water Sources

Most Sauri house holds rely on a combination of sources to provide water for house hold use as shown in Table 1. Of the 285 house holds surveyed, 60.4% reported using two sources, 21.8% reported using three sources and 14% reported using just one source. Among the households using one water source (40 hhs), primary springs are the predominant water source used for collection (35 hhs).
Table 1. Number of water sources used per household


No. of water sources used

% of total households

1

14.0%

2

60.4%

3

21.8%

4

3.9%

The majority of households using two or three sources combine spring with additional source. Overall, most households in Sauri combine a primary spring with other water sources mainly rainwater harvesting systems as shown in Table 2).


Households reported collecting an average of 860 liters per week during the wet season and 880 liters a week during the dry season for all uses (household and otherwise). Most of the water collected by house holds for all uses comes from rainwater collection system and springs. In the wet season, 50.6% of water is collected from rainwater collection systems. This drops to 3.5% during the dry season – this can be attributed to lack of rainfall and long-term storage facilities. Springs provide 39% of water during the wet season, which shifts to 85% in the dry season, indicating a much heavier reliance on springs when rainwater is not available.

 

Table 2. Average % of total water collected by each household from each source (N=285)


Source

Season

Wet

Dry

Household well (hand dug shallow well)

0.3%

0.3%

Communal or cooperative water tank

0.4%

0.1%

Rainwater collection/harvesting system

50.6%

3.5%

Primary spring

37.3%

79.4%

Other springs

1.3%

5.6%

River or stream

0.4%

0.8%

Private water tap

8.3%

9.4%

Others

1.5%

1.0%

 

 Access to Water

Long distances to water sources and large amounts of time spent collecting water are major obstacles to improving community health and economy. Time spent collecting water could otherwise be spent on economic activities, child rearing, educational activities, etc. WHO has shown that when it takes more than a 30 minute trip to reach a water source, the amount of water collected is not adequate to reach the minimum amount required for drinking, cooking and personal hygiene (WHO/UNICEF, 2005)1.


According to a baseline report approximately 60.7% of the households in Sauri cluster have sustainable access to an improved water source. However 46% of the households use untreated water. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out a water quality analysis is even at household level.  This is because as much as households take water from the same wells or a source there is likelihood that most do not treat water.  The average distance to the water source is 370 m and 429 m in wet season and dry season respectively.
The number of households that have access to an improved water source are those that satisfy the following conditions:

For Sauri, all reported water sources are at distances of less than 1,000 m from the household. Thus water access is determined by the quantity of water available per capita (litres/day) in both the wet and dry season. According to a baseline water survey,  155 households (N=290) did not have the minimum 20 litres per capita daily for both wet and dry seasons. Therefore, 46.6% of the households did not have an acceptable access to a water source.

 

Water and Sanitation Sector Objectives

Main Cluster Goal

The main cluster goal is that in 5 years, the target community will have access to and manage effectively safe and sufficient quantities of water for drinking and other household needs.  That water will also be closer to households relieving much of the burden now borne by women and children.Capacity building activities to promote healthy hygiene and sanitation practices will improve community health and reduce disease burden.

Sector Objective

The overall sector objective is based on MDGs target 10, i.e to reduce by half the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and sanitation. Some of the other related MDGs targets are:

Specific objectives

 

The specific objectives and goals are:

 

Proposed MDG Alignment & Interventions for the Sikulu Water Project

In order to achieve MDG goals and objectives, the following interventions, among others in water related sectors, will be carried out.

Assessment and Mapping of Water Resources

To identify viable water sources and exploitation technologies the following activities will be undertaken: (see related progress reports)

 
Monitoring Plan and Evaluation:  Bar-Sauri Plan of Action
The community shall participate in the monitoring and evaluation of water & sanitation interventions. Participatory monitoring and evaluation has the following benefits:
PDF DOWNLOAD: RESULTS MONITORING PLAN (PDF: 159 kb)